USPTO serial 76192510
WINEX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2884608Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Sep 14, 2004
- Examiner
- THOMPSON, LAVERNE
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 116
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with WINEX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jai H. Kim
Jai H. Kim PAK Law Corporation9465 Garden Grove Boulevard Suite 101Garden Grove, CA 92844UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | motorcycle helmets and accessories, namely, protective gloves, safety goggles, chest protectors, protective belts and protective clothing for motorcyclists | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 17, 2015 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Sep 15, 2010 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Sep 15, 2010 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 7, 2010 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 14, 2004 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jun 25, 2004 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Jun 9, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jun 2, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 5, 2004 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Mar 24, 2004 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 24, 2004 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Feb 24, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 4, 2004 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Dec 4, 2003 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Dec 4, 2003 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 4, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 2, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 25, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 25, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Feb 25, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 3, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 13, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 25, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 26, 2002 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Mar 4, 2002 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 31, 2001 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 23, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 19, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |