USPTO serial 76192684
TECHNOLOGY BY IDATECH
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BUSH, KAREN K
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with TECHNOLOGY BY IDATECH?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
David S. D'Ascenzo
DAVID S DASCENZO KOLISCH HARTWELL PC520 SW YAMHILL ST STE 200PORTLAND, OR 97204UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Electrical power generation equipment, namely, fuel cells, proton exchange membrane fuel cells, fuel cell stacks, fuel cell conversion components, fuel cell integrators, and electrical power management modules, namely, power inverters, power converters, power conditioners, power controllers and load regulators; fuel cell systems and components for stationary and portable electric power generation comprised of fuel cell stacks, fuel processors, fuel cell integrators and electrical power management modules, namely, power inverters, power converters, power conditioners, power controllers and load regulators | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 13, 2006 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 13, 2006 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 31, 2005 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 31, 2005 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Oct 31, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 18, 2005 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| May 9, 2005 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| May 2, 2005 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| May 2, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 4, 2004 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 26, 2004 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Oct 26, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 27, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 16, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| May 26, 2004 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| May 26, 2004 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 3, 2004 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| May 3, 2004 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| May 3, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 3, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 10, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 5, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Oct 27, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 6, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 11, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 22, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 4, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 4, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 24, 2002 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Apr 30, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 25, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 16, 2002 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Nov 6, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 11, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 2, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 27, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |