USPTO serial 76192705
INTRABRAIN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DELANEY, ZHALEH SYBIL
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with INTRABRAIN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
10627 Berlin, DE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Richard M LaBarge
RICHARD M LABARGE MARSHALL O'TOOLE GERSTEIN MURRAY & BORUN6300 SEARS TWR233 S WACKER DRCHICAGO, IL 60606-6306Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | database development services, namely setting up databases that can be accessed by means of communications facilities, in particular, via the Internet and mobile telephony networks and within intranet systems; computer services, namely development of chat room systems; development of knowledge exchange software for use in intranet networks, providing an on-line computer database in the field of information technology that can be accessed by means of communication facilities, in particular via the Internet and mobile telephony networks within intranet systems; mediation services in the field of information technology relating to the acceptance of advice of particular technology experts with know-how in the development of intranet systems; computer services, namely providing databases featuring general and local news, and information of interest to specific geographic areas that can be accessed by means of by means of communication facilities, in particular via the Internet and mobile telephony networks within intranet systems | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 31, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 13, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 29, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 26, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 26, 2001 | 1.BD | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| May 11, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 2, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |