USPTO serial 76192729
EUROSHOPPER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ALT, JILL
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 114 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with EUROSHOPPER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Melise R. Blakeslee
MELISE R BLAKESLEE MCDERMOTT WILL & EMERY600 13TH ST NWWASHINGTON, DC 20005-3096UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Mail order, retail and distributorship services featuring grocery, food products, house wares, gardening tools, gardening equipment and accessories, seeds, plants, roots, bulbs, tubers, kitchen wares, dinner wares, books, magazines and CD-ROMS on food, cooking and gardening, cleaning products, restaurant equipment and supplies and equipment for use in the food preparation industry; electronic catalog shopping services through computer networks for featuring grocery, food products, house wares, gardening tools, gardening equipment and accessories, seeds, plants, roots, bulbs, tubers, kitchen wares, dinner wares, books, magazines and CD-ROMS on food, cooking and gardening, cleaning products, restaurant equipment and supplies, and equipment for use in the food preparation industry; electronic commerce services, namely, order management services, transaction processing services, and electronic payment services; dissemination of advertising matter by electronic means, namely, dissemination of advertising matter by a website accessed through a global computer information network; and providing recipes and information on groceries, food products, house wares, gardening tools, gardening equipment and accessories, seeds, plants, roots, bulbs, tubers, kitchen wares, dinner wares, books, magazines and CD-ROMS on food, cooking and gardening, cleaning products, restaurant equipment and supplies and equipment for use in the food preparation industry via a website | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 11, 2011 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 10, 2011 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 14, 2010 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 13, 2010 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 8, 2009 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| May 11, 2009 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Nov 10, 2008 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Apr 30, 2008 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Oct 25, 2007 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jan 11, 2007 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jan 11, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 20, 2006 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Dec 9, 2005 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| May 27, 2005 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Nov 22, 2004 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Oct 3, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Oct 22, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 22, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 21, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 21, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 14, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |