Drawing for DIGITAL GENETECHNOLOGIES INC

USPTO serial 76192962

DIGITAL GENETECHNOLOGIES INC

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MARTIN, EUGENIA K
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DIGITAL GENETECHNOLOGIES INC?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

JEFFREY P. WALL

JEFFREY P WALL O'MELVENY & MYERS LLP610 NEWPORT CTR DR FL 17NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92660-6419UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042exploitation of genomic bioinformatics, namely, creating automated tissue assays using PCR-based subdivisions of genetics material, providing proprietary databases in the field of genomic bioinformatics, and genomic research, including new gene discoveryACTIVEMar 19, 1996

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 12, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Jan 7, 2004EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jan 7, 2004EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jul 15, 2003EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Apr 23, 2003ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jan 16, 2003EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jan 3, 2003EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Jun 20, 2002CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 26, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 26, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 28, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 1, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance