Drawing for KARYO

USPTO serial 76193188

KARYO

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CHISOLM, KEVON
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with KARYO?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Avital (Tally) Eitan

AVITAL (TALLY) EITAN LANDON & STARK ASSOCIATES2011 CRYSTAL DR STE 210ARLINGTON, VA 22202UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009COMPUTER HARDWARE AND SOFTWARE FOR VIDEOCONFERENCING AND TELECONFERENCING; COMPUTER PERIPHERALS FOR VIDEO AND AUDIO CONFERENCINGACTIVE—
036FINANCIAL AFFAIRS, NAMELY FINANCIAL SERVICES FOR LEASING VIDEO AND AUDIO CONFERENCING EQUIPMENTACTIVE—
038TELECOMMUNICATIONS SERVICES, NAMELY TRANSMITTING AND RECEIVING VIDEO AND AUDIO OVER NETWORKS AND GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORK PROTOCOL AND VIDEO AND AUDIO CONFERENCING; TELECOMMUNICATIONS SERVICES, NAMELY TRANSMITTING VIDEO AND AUDIO OVER NETWORKS, NAMELY ISDN/TELEPHONY NETWORKS, LAN, WAN, VPN, PUBLIC NETWORKS AND VISUAL GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORK CONFERENCING FOR THE NETWORKS OVER ISDN/TELEPHONY NETWORKS, LAN, WAN, VPN AND PUBLIC NETWORKS, GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORKS, BROADBAND NETWORKS AND GLOBAL COMMUNICATION NETWORKS; MULTIPOINT CONFERENCING SERVICE SERVICES; INTERNET PORTAL SERVICES, NAMELY, PROVIDING INFORMATION IN THE FIELD OF TELECONFERENCING AND VIDEOCONFERENCINGACTIVE—
042COMPUTER SERVICES, NAMELY COMPUTER CONSULTING, COMPUTER SOFTWARE CUSTOM DESIGN, PROTOTYPING, TESTING, INSTALLATION OF COMPUTER SOFTWARE, TECHNICAL SUPPORT SERVICES, NAMELY TROUBLESHOOTING OF COMPUTER HARDWARE AND SOFTWARE PROBLEMS VIA TELEPHONE, E-MAIL AND IN PERSON; APPLICATION SERVICE PROVIDER IN THE FIELD OF DATABASE MANAGEMENT AND VIDEO AND AUDIO CONFERENCING; INTERNET PORTAL SERVICES, NAMELY, PROVIDING INFORMATION IN THE FIELD OF COMPUTERSACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 26, 2003ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 21, 2003NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 29, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 9, 2002NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Aug 6, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 2, 2002CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Jul 22, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 24, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 23, 2002ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Mar 7, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 23, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 23, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 19, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance