Drawing for STABILIZER

USPTO serial 76193225

STABILIZER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 2644773Status 711
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Oct 29, 2002
Examiner
FRYE, KIMBERLY
Law office
POST REGISTRATION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with STABILIZER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

John W. Mcllvaine

JOHN W MCLLVAINE WEBB ZIESENHEIM LOGSDON ORKIN & HANSON700 KOPPER BLDG436 SEVENTH AVEPITTSBURGH, PA 15219

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007band saw blade guidesSECTION 7(e) - CANCELLEDMar 8, 1999

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 19, 2008C7..CANCELLED SECTION 7-TOTAL—
Aug 6, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 16, 2008C7RFREQUEST FOR SECT 7 TOTAL SURRENDER FILED—
Jul 16, 2008MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 5, 2002EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Oct 29, 2002R.SRREGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTERYour mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application.
Aug 12, 2002CNTAAPPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER—
Aug 9, 2002EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Aug 9, 2002JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Feb 28, 2002CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 24, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 16, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 12, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance