Drawing for ACTIVE SERVER

USPTO serial 76193230

ACTIVE SERVER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
THOMPKINS, TRICIA
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ACTIVE SERVER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Laura E. Goldbard

LAURA E GOLDBARD STROOCK & STROOCK & LAVAN LLP180 MAIDEN LNNEW YORK, NY 10038-4982UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009computer software for server management and for use in the registration of digital addresses and compute hardware for data processingACTIVE—
037Installation, maintenance and repair of computer processing equipment, namely computers and computer peripherals for use networks, databases; and installation, maintenance and repair of communications equipment, namely telephones and telephone communication linesACTIVE—
042Rental and computerized data processing equipment; rental of computers and software; and rapier of computer softwareACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 7, 2003ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Jul 1, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Jun 17, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 17, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 20, 2003CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 27, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 18, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 7, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 19, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 19, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 26, 2002CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Dec 5, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 6, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 1, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance