USPTO serial 76193274
SHARKMAN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 614
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BUONGIORNO, CHRISTOPHER L
- Law office
- PETITIONS OFFICE
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SHARKMAN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | COMIC BOOKS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 9, 2006 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| Nov 7, 2006 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Oct 23, 2006 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 23, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 17, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 15, 2006 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 15, 2006 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 1, 2005 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 18, 2005 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jul 29, 2005 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Jul 29, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 7, 2005 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Jun 10, 2005 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jun 9, 2005 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 15, 2005 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 15, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 31, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 31, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 4, 2005 | LEXT | LATE FILED EXTENSION REQUEST | — |
| Jan 4, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 10, 2004 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jun 24, 2004 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 17, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jun 7, 2004 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jun 7, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 5, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 6, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Nov 6, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 15, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| May 8, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 3, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Dec 10, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 17, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 28, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 29, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 23, 2002 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Apr 19, 2002 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Mar 21, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 12, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 15, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 9, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |