Drawing for VIVALDI NETMERGE

USPTO serial 76193309

VIVALDI NETMERGE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
TINGLEY, JOHN
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with VIVALDI NETMERGE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Amy L Nelkin

AMY L NELKIN DARBY AND DARBY805 3RD AVE FL 26NEW YORK, NY 10022-7557UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009COMPUTER SOFTWARE THAT SUPPORTS GLOBAL FULFILLMENT AND CUSTOMER SERVICE FOR E-BUSINESS, NAMELY, ADVANCED ORDER MANAGEMENT SOFTWARE, SUPPLY CHAIN EXECUTION SOFTWARE, CUSTOMER RELATIONSHIP MANAGEMENT SOFTWARE AND DECISION SUPPORT SOFTWARE TO SUPPLEMENT THOSE AREASACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 6, 2002ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Sep 6, 2002ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Aug 20, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 31, 2002NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Apr 19, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 18, 2002REINREINSTATED—
Feb 15, 2002ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Feb 15, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 11, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 23, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 20, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance