Drawing for THE NOONAN SYNDROME SUPPORT GROUP

USPTO serial 76193326

THE NOONAN SYNDROME SUPPORT GROUP

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BOAGNI, MARY
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with THE NOONAN SYNDROME SUPPORT GROUP?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

RACHEL A. ISRAEL

RACHEL A ISRAEL MURPHY HESSE TOOMEY & LEHANE300 CROWN COLONY DRP O BOX 9126QUINCY, MA 02269-9126

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009DOWNLOADABLE ELECTRONIC PUBLICATIONS IN THE NATURE OF EDUCATIONAL MATERIALS AND SUPPORT RESOURCES IN THE FIELD OF NOONAN SYNDROMEACTIVE—
016PAMPHLETS, BROCHURES, BOOKS AND NEWSLETTERS RELATING TO NOONAN SYNDROME AND NOONAN SYNDROME RESEARCHACTIVE—
036CHARITABLE FUND RAISING SERVICES RELATING TO NOONAN SYNDROME BY MEANS OF PROMOTIONAL MATERIALS FOR FUND RAISING EVENTS SUCH AS BAGS, PENS, CLOTHING, PINS, BLANKETS, SWEATERS, T-SHIRTS, AND OTHER MISCELLANEOUS FUND RAISING MERCHANDISEACTIVE—
041EDUCATIONAL SERVICES; NAMELY CONDUCTING EDUCATIONAL SPECIAL EVENTS AND CONFERENCES, SEMINARS, AND WORKSHOPS TO INCREASE PUBLIC AWARENESS OF NOONAN SYNDROMEACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 1, 2004EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Sep 1, 2004ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 15, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Dec 23, 2003NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Sep 30, 2003PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 10, 2003NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jun 15, 2003CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 19, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 19, 2003CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Feb 14, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 14, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 20, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 19, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 19, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 19, 2002JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Nov 19, 2002EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Oct 31, 2002EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Oct 9, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 8, 2002CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 7, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 28, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 28, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 15, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance