USPTO serial 76193365
GIORGIO SANT' ANGELO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- PAPPAS, MATTHEW
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 105 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with GIORGIO SANT' ANGELO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
ALLAN S PILSON
ALLAN S PILSON LADAS & PARRY26 W 61ST STNEW YORK, NY 10023UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | (FIRST USE 09-30-2000; IN COMMERCE 09-30-2000) Women's pants, blazers, suits, shorts, skirts, vests and jumpers; (FIRST USE 11-00-2003; IN COMMERCE 11-00-2003) Furs, bathing suits, intimate apparel and lingerie, camisoles, slips, body briefers, brassieres, panties, garter belts and foundation garments; pajamas, nightgowns, bathrobes, socks, tights, pantyhose and sheer hosiery, shoes, belts, scarves, jogging suits; outerwear, namely, coats, jackets, parkas, vests, rainwear; shirts, blouses; knitwear, namely, shirts, pants, dresses, blouses, tops, bottoms; t-shirts, turtleneck sweaters, jeans, denim shorts and dresses | ACTIVE | Sep 30, 2000 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by GIORGIO SANT' ANGELO LICENSING LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
- Other trademarks owned by GIORGIO SANT' ANGELO LICENSING LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Similar marks named GIORGIO SANT' ANGELO
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 24, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 24, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 15, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 14, 2004 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 8, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 17, 2004 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 17, 2004 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 4, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jul 23, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 21, 2004 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 21, 2004 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jul 21, 2004 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jul 21, 2004 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 26, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 17, 2004 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 23, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 21, 2004 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Aug 20, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 21, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jul 21, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 21, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 29, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 9, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 8, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 26, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 19, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 1, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |