USPTO serial 76193380
CAFE' SAN MIGUEL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3518695Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Oct 21, 2008
- Examiner
- EULIN, INGRID C
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with CAFE' SAN MIGUEL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Saanichton, B.C. V8M 1Z9, CA
Saanichton, B.C. V8M 1Z9, CA
Saanichton, B.C. V8M 1Z9, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Leslie C. Ruiter
Leslie C. Ruiter STOKES LAWRENCE, P.S.1420 FIFTH AVENUE, SUITE 3000SEATTLE, WA 98101UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | Ground and whole bean coffee and related coffee products made primarily of whole coffee beans, namely chocolate covered coffee beans | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | May 1, 1999 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Level Ground Trading Ltd.
- Other trademarks owned by Level Ground Trading Ltd.
- Other trademarks owned by Level Ground Trading Ltd.
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Similar marks named CAFE' SAN MIGUEL
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 22, 2015 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Nov 27, 2012 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 27, 2012 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 21, 2008 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Sep 15, 2008 | TMBN | TTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS | — |
| Sep 15, 2008 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 15, 2008 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 13, 2005 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 5, 2005 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 7, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 17, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 5, 2004 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 20, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 17, 2004 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 17, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 17, 2004 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Sep 16, 2004 | 44DD | SEC. 44(D) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Sep 16, 2004 | 1.BD | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Sep 16, 2004 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 16, 2004 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 24, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Aug 20, 2003 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 8, 2003 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jun 27, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 16, 2003 | ZZZY | PREVIOUS ACTION COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Feb 19, 2003 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 19, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 12, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 2, 2002 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 20, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 5, 2001 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| May 14, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 3, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |