USPTO serial 76193735
CONSTRUMIX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CLARK, GLENN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with CONSTRUMIX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Monterrey Nuevo Leon, MX
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
A. Thomas S. Safford
A THOMAS S SAFFORD FROMMER LAWERNCE & HAUG LLP745 FIFTH AVENEW YORK, NY 10151UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Market research, product demonstration, direct mail advertising, promoting the goods and services of others by distributing printed advertising materials and providing advertising space on Internet web pages, identifying for others how to develop business and management opportunities and prospective clients, all for corporations in, serving, or related to the construction industry; Promoting the goods and services of others through business and management advice on marketing and supply of construction materials, namely cement, concrete, mortar, stone, lime, plaster, gravel, floor slabs including flagstones, partitions, baked and unbaked bricks, roof slabs including tiles, mosaic, non-metallic rigid tubes and piping for construction, asphalt, tar and bitumen, non-metallic transportable construction elements, such as modules, panels, pre-cast columns and non-metallic monuments, rebar, columns, steel reinforcement of all kinds for setting-up forms and pouring of concrete components and materials related to those mentioned above | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | Educational services, namely conducting conferences, fora, symposia, colloquia, congresses, and courses and displaying educational exhibits, all directly, and also alternatively by interactive remote communication, in the area of construction and community service; providing information about construction and construction projects via direct mail, electronic mail and the global computer network; training others in the organization and running of business/business or business/consumer group purchasing and/or selling organizations and of contests to promote the goods and services of others | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Consulting services in the areas of construction, engineering, architecture; Consulting in regard to construction design and materials, construction methods, construction products, mixtures, and methods.; and Consulting services in the area of fostering a culture of savings and group purchasing to optimize prices and services | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 24, 2004 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 24, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 26, 2004 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 7, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jun 24, 2003 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 24, 2003 | 1.BD | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Apr 24, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 24, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 22, 2002 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 17, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 6, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 8, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 5, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 7, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 30, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 20, 2001 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 12, 2001 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Feb 12, 2001 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |