USPTO serial 76193922
SHIELD ENHANCED RTP
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Oct 15, 2002
- Examiner
- LE, KHANH M
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with SHIELD ENHANCED RTP?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
D-89160 Dornstadt, DE
D-89160 Dornstadt, DE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Robert W. Becker
ROBERT W BECKER ROBERT W. BECKER & ASSOCIATES707 HWY 66 E STE BTIJERAS, NM 87059UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | machines and replacements parts for the treatment, processing, and manufacture of substrates, semiconductor substrates, silicon discs, wafers, semiconductor chips, semiconductor components, microprocessor and memory chips | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 011 | Heating units for the processing, treatment and heating of silicon chips for the manufacture of semiconductors | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 040 | Material, surface and heat processing and treatment in the nature of heating, doping, cleaning, etching, processing and stripping, in the field of semiconductor treatment, processing and manufacture of semiconductor chips, semiconductor components, microprocessors and memory chips | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 042 | Scientific and industrial research in the field of semiconductor treatment, processing and manufacture of semiconductor chips, semiconductor components, microprocessors and memory chips | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by STEAG RTP Systems GmbH
- Other trademarks owned by STEAG RTP Systems GmbH
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Other trademarks in Class 011
- Other trademarks in Class 040
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named SHIELD ENHANCED RTP
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 23, 2009 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Mar 4, 2008 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Nov 17, 2002 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 15, 2002 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Jul 19, 2002 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 2, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 2, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 6, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 30, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 26, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 24, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 22, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 21, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 5, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 5, 2001 | 1.BD | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM DELETED | — |