USPTO serial 76194096
PINK HEAVEN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- RHIM, ANDREW
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with PINK HEAVEN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jean-Marc Zimmermian
226 ST PAUL STWESTFIELD, NJ 07090UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | COSMETICS; PERFUMES; TOILETRIES, NAMELY, SHAMPOO, CONDITIONER, HAIR RINSE, HAIR GEL, HAIR MOUSSE, HAND SOAP, BODY SCRUB, TONER, SKIN EXFOLIATOR, SKIN CLARIFIER, SKIN MOISTURIZER, MAKE-UP REMOVER, SKIN CLEANING CREAM AND GEL, FACE AND BODY LOTION, FACE AND BODY CREAM, FACE AND BODY OIL, SUN SCREEN, SHAVING CREAM, SHAVING PREPARATIONS IN THE NATURE OF A SPRAY, SKIN LIGHTENER, HAIR POMADE, MUSTACHE WAX, PERSONAL DEODORANT, TOOTHPASTE, MOUTHWASH, BREATH FRESHENER IN THE NATURE OF MOUTH SPRAY, NON-MEDICATED BATH SALTS, BUBBLE BATH IN THE NATURE OF A GEL, OIL AND POWDER, CUTICLE CREAM AND CUTICLE REMOVING PREPARATION | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 16, 2003 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Dec 16, 2003 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 16, 2003 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 16, 2003 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 9, 2003 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 23, 2002 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 10, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 21, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 12, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 25, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 31, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 27, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 27, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 18, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 7, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |