USPTO serial 76194428
ALFA TOOLS MEGACUT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CORDOVA, RAUL
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ALFA TOOLS MEGACUT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Vangelis Economou
VANGELIS ECONOMOU RYNDAK & SURI30 N LASALLE ST STE 2630CHICAGO, IL 60602UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Abrasive cutting and grinding wheels, diamond cutting blades and diamond core bits | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 28, 2006 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jul 21, 2005 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Feb 19, 2005 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Feb 18, 2005 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Nov 15, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 15, 2004 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Nov 11, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 20, 2004 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 20, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 12, 2004 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| May 12, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 26, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 13, 2004 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Jan 9, 2004 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jan 8, 2004 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Dec 17, 2003 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Dec 15, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 11, 2003 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 5, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 7, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 3, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 4, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 19, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 5, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 2, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 3, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 16, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |