USPTO serial 76194432
TRATTORIA NOVA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BEVERLY, JOSETTE MICHELLE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with TRATTORIA NOVA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
PIZZA NOVA RESTAURANTS LIMITED
Scarborough, Ontario M1H 3A6, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
William H. Logsdon
WILLIAM H LOGSDON WEBB ZIESENHEIM LOGSDON ORKIN & HANSON700 KOPPERS BLDG436 SEVENTH AVEPITTSBURGH, PA 15219-1818Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Restaurant Services | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 13, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 9, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 7, 2003 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 27, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 27, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 3, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 3, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 11, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 6, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 9, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |