USPTO serial 76194790
EVERNETPAY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SPRUILL, DARRYL M
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with EVERNETPAY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Montreal, Quebec H3A 3K3, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Diane Donnelly
DIANE DONNELLY VON MALTITZ DERENBERG KUNIN JANSSEN ET A60 E 42ND STNEW YORK, NY 10165UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Facilitating employment opportunities by providing job listings by means of a web site on the Internet | ACTIVE | Oct 31, 2001 |
| 036 | FINANCIAL SERVICES OFFERED ON CELLULAR TELEPHONES VIA THE INTERNET PERMITTING INDIVIDUAL TO CARRY OUT FINANCIAL OPERATIONS, NAMELY, BILL PAYMENT SERVICES, ELECTRONIC FUNDS TRANSFER, AND MONETARY EXCHANGE AND CONVERSION SERVICES; AND AUTHENTICATION AND VERIFICATION OF BILL PAYMENT SERVICES, ELECTRONIC FUNDS TRANSFERS AND MONETARY EXCHANGE AND CONVERSION SERVICES | ACTIVE | — |
| 037 | ELECTRONIC TRANSMISSION OF FINANCIAL DATA AN DOCUMENTS VIA CELLULAR TELEPHONES | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 9, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 1, 2003 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 27, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 3, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 31, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 6, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 8, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 6, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 8, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |