USPTO serial 76194923
PERFECTGIFTCARD
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2728292Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jun 17, 2003
- Examiner
- PENDLETON, CAROLYN A
- Law office
- POST REGISTRATION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with PERFECTGIFTCARD?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MARCIA A. AUBERGER
MARCIA A. AUBERGER VENABLE LLP575 SEVENTH STREET, NWWASHINGTON, DC 20004UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | PRE-FUNDED MAGNETICALLY AND/OR ELECTRONICALLY ENCODED GIFT CERTIFICATE CARDS HAVING A STORED VALUE | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 24, 2014 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Jul 29, 2009 | PRAN | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED NO RESPONSE REQUIRED | — |
| Jul 16, 2009 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Jun 10, 2009 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 3, 2009 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jun 1, 2009 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Jun 1, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 13, 2008 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Sep 5, 2006 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 5, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 17, 2003 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Apr 17, 2003 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Apr 15, 2003 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 15, 2003 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Apr 4, 2003 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 31, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 31, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 31, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 26, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 25, 2003 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Feb 10, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 10, 2003 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Dec 6, 2002 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Nov 21, 2002 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Oct 24, 2002 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 25, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 24, 2002 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Sep 24, 2002 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Sep 24, 2002 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Sep 18, 2002 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Mar 11, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 26, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 26, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 25, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |