USPTO serial 76194956
CHROMALITE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SHANOSKI, JOANNA MARIE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CHROMALITE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Purolite Company, A Division of Bro-Tech Corporation, The
Bala Cynwyd, PA
Other trademarks owned by Purolite Company, A Division of Bro-Tech Corporation, The
Purolite Company, A Division of Bro-Tech Corporation, The
Bala Cynwyd, PA
Other trademarks owned by Purolite Company, A Division of Bro-Tech Corporation, The
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Herbert B Keil
HERBERT B KEIL KEIL & WEINKAUF1101 CONNECTICUT AVE NWWASHINGTON, DC 20036-4303UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | CHROMATOGRAPHY COLUMNS; APPARATUS AND INSTRUMENTS FOR USE IN HIGH-PRESSURE LIQUID CHROMATOGRAPHY AND PURIFICATION OF LIQUIDS, NAMELY SAMPLING TUBES AND FLOW CONTROL SWITCHES; WATER QUALITY TESTING UNITS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Purolite Company, A Division of Bro-Tech Corporation, The
- Other trademarks owned by Purolite Company, A Division of Bro-Tech Corporation, The
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named CHROMALITE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 7, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 24, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 7, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 3, 2002 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 30, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 10, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 14, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 6, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 15, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 25, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |