USPTO serial 76195006
AUDIO BOX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MORRIS, KRISTINA KLOIBER
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with AUDIO BOX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
D-79108 Freiburg, DE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Patrick J. O'Shea
PATRICK J OSHEA O'SHEA, GETZ & KOSAKOWSKI PC1500 MAIN ST STE 912SPRINGFIELD, MA 01115UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Electrical apparatus and software for receiving electrical or radio frequency signals from a computer indicative of digital audio transmissions, and for storing and converting or decompressing the received signals indicative of digital audio transmissions and transferring the stored, converted or decompressed digital audio transmissions as electrical signals to home, professional and personal audio equipment, namely receivers, DVD or CD players, MP3 players and audio servers | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 31, 2007 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 29, 2007 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 25, 2007 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 24, 2007 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| May 24, 2007 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| May 24, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 20, 2006 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 18, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 15, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 27, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 27, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 27, 2006 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 26, 2006 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 19, 2006 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Oct 19, 2005 | CRML | CORRESPONDENCE MAILED | — |
| Oct 19, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 29, 2005 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Aug 19, 2005 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 19, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 13, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 13, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 8, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 1, 2004 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 31, 2004 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 19, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 9, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 9, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 5, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 5, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 17, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| May 15, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 15, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 12, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 2, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 18, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 18, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 14, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 3, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 3, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 30, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 22, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 25, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 14, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 8, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 25, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |