Drawing for NOTIVA

USPTO serial 76195201

NOTIVA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
VERHOSEK, WILLIAM T
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with NOTIVA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Harold J. Milstein, Lisa Greenwald-Swire, Beth M. Goldman, John C. Wilson, Todd E. Adler

HAROLD J MILSTEIN, LISA GREENWALD-SWIRE HELLER EHRMAN WHITE & MCAULIFFE LLP275 MIDDLEFIELD RDMENLO PARK, CA 94025-3506UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
036Processing of factoring transactions, namely accounts receivable and accounts payable financing; electronic payment services, namely, electronic processing and transmission of bill payment data in the field of accounts receivable and accounts payable factoring transactionsACTIVE—
038Providing on-line bulletin boards and chatrooms for communications between parties in accounts payable and accounts receivable factoring transactionsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 19, 2006MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 19, 2006ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 11, 2005EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
May 11, 2005EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
May 11, 2005EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 8, 2004EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Nov 8, 2004EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Nov 8, 2004EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 8, 2004ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 8, 2004REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jun 3, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
May 24, 2004DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
May 24, 2004EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
May 12, 2004DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
May 12, 2004EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
May 12, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 21, 2003EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Nov 12, 2003EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Nov 12, 2003EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 20, 2003EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
May 12, 2003EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
May 12, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 12, 2002NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Aug 20, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 31, 2002NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jun 5, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 2, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 12, 2002CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Dec 12, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 14, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 5, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance