USPTO serial 76195307
SEE.ZOOM.GO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- NELSON, EDWARD
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SEE.ZOOM.GO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
ONTARIO K1J 9B9, CA
Ottawa, Ontario K1J 9B9, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jeffrey A. Smith
JEFFREY A SMITH MILLEN WHITE ZELANO & BRANIGAN PC2200 CLARENDON BLVD STE 1400ARLINGTON, VA 22201UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Graphics software for the world wide web, Internet, intranet, and similar network environments; Graphics software for use on a global network of interconnected computers and computer networks; Computer software for use in modifying, converting and re-formatting information, data, text and images and for accessing, viewing, transferring and storing information, data, text and images over computer networks, telecommunications networks and data communications and networks of all types; Development tool kit consisting of computer software for the creation of filters that modify, convert and re-format information, data, text and images in legacy formats to formats that my be accessed, viewed, transferred and stored over computer networks, data communications networks and telecommunications networks of all types; Cross-platform graphical rendition engine for software, firmware and hardware applications, Computer hardware | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Design and development of computer software for others for the world wide web, Internet, intranet, and similar network environments; Design and development of computer software for others for a global network of interconnected computers and computer networks; Design and development of computer software for others for use in modifying converting and re-formatting information, data, text and images and for accessing, viewing, transferring and storing information, data, text and images over computer networks, telecommunications networks and data communications and networks of all types; Offering customer and technical assistance by telephone, electronic mail and in-person in the field of graphics software | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 2, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 23, 2003 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 23, 2003 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Apr 22, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 4, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 22, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 17, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 19, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 9, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 5, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |