USPTO serial 76195358
WATERTIGER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Sep 5, 2006
- Examiner
- VERHOSEK, WILLIAM T
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.
Need help with WATERTIGER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Plus Government fees of $850
Owner
TIGER PURIFICATION SYSTEMS INC.
Burnaby, BC, CA
PRO STAR MECHANICAL TECHNOLOGIES LTD.
Victoria British Columbia, CA
Other trademarks owned by PRO STAR MECHANICAL TECHNOLOGIES LTD.
PRO STAR MECHANICAL TECHNOLOGIES LTD.
Victoria British Columbia, CA
Other trademarks owned by PRO STAR MECHANICAL TECHNOLOGIES LTD.
PRO STAR MECHANICAL TECHNOLOGIES LTD.
Victoria British Columbia, CA
Other trademarks owned by PRO STAR MECHANICAL TECHNOLOGIES LTD.
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Michael G. Atkins
Michael G. Atkins Atkins Intellectual Property, PLLC600 First Avenue, Suite 330 #18483Seattle, WA 98104-2246United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 011 | water purification units; parts and accessories for water purification units, namely, filters, water softeners, ultra violet light disinfectors, membranes, housings, pumps, tanks, ultra violet lights, valves and faucets | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by TIGER PURIFICATION SYSTEMS INC.
- Other trademarks owned by PRO STAR MECHANICAL TECHNOLOGIES LTD.
- Other trademarks owned by PRO STAR MECHANICAL TECHNOLOGIES LTD.
- Other trademarks owned by PRO STAR MECHANICAL TECHNOLOGIES LTD.
- Other trademarks in Class 011
- Similar marks named WATERTIGER
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 26, 2026 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 5, 2025 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 13, 2016 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 13, 2016 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Jun 13, 2016 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Jun 10, 2016 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 24, 2016 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 5, 2015 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 15, 2013 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 4, 2012 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Jul 4, 2012 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 6, 2012 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 6, 2012 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Jun 6, 2012 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| May 28, 2012 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 8, 2006 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Sep 5, 2006 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jun 13, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 24, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 20, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 17, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 11, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 5, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 13, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 13, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 22, 2005 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 22, 2005 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 16, 2005 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 16, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 14, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 5, 2005 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 5, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 30, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 30, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 5, 2005 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Dec 5, 2004 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Dec 5, 2004 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Dec 5, 2004 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| May 8, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jul 3, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 27, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 25, 2002 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| May 7, 2002 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Apr 19, 2002 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Mar 21, 2002 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 11, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 24, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 17, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |