USPTO serial 76195442
RELIANT STADIUM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BENZMILLER, ANDREW
- Law office
- DIVISIONAL UNIT
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with RELIANT STADIUM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JAMES R. ROBINSON
JAMES R ROBINSON BAKER BOTTS LLP910 LOUISIANA STHOUSTON, TX 77002-4916UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 038 | COMPUTER SERVICES, NAMELY, PROVIDING AN ON-LINE CHAT ROOM AND BULLETIN BOARD IN THE FIELDS OF ENTERTAINMENT AND SPORTS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Reliant Energy, Incorporated
- Other trademarks owned by RELAINT RESOURCES, INC
- Other trademarks owned by Reliant Energy, Incorporated
- Other trademarks in Class 038
- Similar marks named RELIANT STADIUM
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 28, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 28, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 5, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Mar 26, 2004 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 26, 2004 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Mar 26, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 27, 2003 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 29, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 26, 2003 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Mar 31, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 26, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 26, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Oct 16, 2002 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 16, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Sep 16, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 26, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 1, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 12, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 26, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 8, 2001 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 8, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 8, 2001 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 8, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 10, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 2, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |