Drawing for RELIANT STADIUM

USPTO serial 76195446

RELIANT STADIUM

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
DUBOIS, SUSAN L
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with RELIANT STADIUM?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Roger Donley

ROGER DONLEY BAKER BOTTS LLP910 LOUISIANAHOUSTON, TX 77002-4995UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
030Staple and snack foods, namely, hot dog sandwiches, hamburger sandwiches, pretzels, popped popcorn, caramel popcorn, tortilla chips, cheese sauce, frozen confections, candy, ketchup, relish and mayonnaiseACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 22, 2004MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 22, 2004ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 22, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Jan 26, 2004EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Jan 6, 2004EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Jan 6, 2004EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 6, 2003EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jul 14, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 9, 2003EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jan 8, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 3, 2003EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jan 3, 2003EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jul 9, 2002NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
May 7, 2002OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
May 7, 2002OP.DOPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999—
Nov 2, 2001OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Sep 24, 2001ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Aug 21, 2001PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 1, 2001NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
May 12, 2001CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 8, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance