Drawing for RELIANT PARK

USPTO serial 76195469

RELIANT PARK

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MCBRIDE, THEODORE M
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with RELIANT PARK?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Robin Lightner Maisashvili

ROBIN LIGHTNER MAISASHVILI BAKER BOTTS LLP910 LOUISIANA STHOUSTON, TX 77002-4916UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
016Paper goods, paper materials and printed matter, namely, posters, mounted and unmounted photographs, postcards, pennants, trading cards, bumper stickers, stickers, decals, iron-on transfers, temporary tattoos, printed labels, score cards, books in the field of football and related sporting events and activities, book covers, address and appointment books, autograph books, scrap books, yearbooks, stationery, magazines and magazine sections in the field of football and related sporting events and activities; food wrappers made of paper, markers, crayons, rubber stamps, stamp pads, pens, pencils, pen and pencil cases, printed tickets, paper napkins, calendars, paper banners, paper and/or plastic merchandise bags, paper flags, coasters made of paper, and containers of paperACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 9, 2004ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 1, 2003EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Nov 21, 2003EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Nov 21, 2003EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 27, 2003NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Mar 4, 2003PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 12, 2003NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jan 21, 2003CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 17, 2003CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Oct 9, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 20, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 10, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 10, 2002ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
May 16, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 15, 2002CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
May 13, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 13, 2002ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Mar 1, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 21, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 2, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 25, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 28, 2001AMPXPRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance