USPTO serial 76195699
BENESOLUTIONS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WATSON, JULIE A
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with BENESOLUTIONS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
RAYMOND H. MCILWAIN
RAYMOND H MCILWAIN KILPATRICK STOCKTON LLP607 14TH ST NW STE 900WASHINGTON, DC 20005-2018UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | COMPUTER PROGRAMS AND SOFTWARE FOR ASSESSING, EVALUATING AND COMPARING HEALTH CARE PLAN COSTS; GENERATING SCHEDULES, FORMS, DOCUMENTS AND REPORTS NECESSARY FOR THE ADMINISTRATION OF CLAIMS; COORDINATING HEALTHCARE PLAN COVERAGE WITH GOVERNMENT SPONSORED HEALTH INSURANCE; AND GENERATING AND FINALIZING COST REPORTS, ALL RELATED TO THE ADMINISTRATION, FILING AND PROCESSING OF MEDICARE CLAIMS | ACTIVE | — |
| 036 | ADMINISTRATION OF PREFERRED PROVIDER PLAN AND ORGANIZED CARE SYSTEMS IN THE FIELD OF HEALTH CARE FOR OTHERS AND PROVIDING RELATED FINANCIAL SERVICES, NAMELY, ACTUARIAL AND MEDICARE COST REPORTING SERVICES | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | LEGAL AND COMPUTER CONSULTATION SERVICES IN THE FIELDS OF ORGANIZATION AND ADMINISTRATION OF PREFERRED PROVIDER PLANS AND ORGANIZED CARE SYSTEMS FOR OTHERS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by BeneSolutions.com LLC
- Other trademarks owned by BeneSolutions.com LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 036
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named BENESOLUTIONS
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 13, 2006 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 13, 2006 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 12, 2005 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 30, 2005 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Sep 30, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 11, 2005 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 28, 2005 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jan 28, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 4, 2005 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 4, 2004 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Oct 4, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 11, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jul 21, 2004 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 8, 2004 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 7, 2004 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| May 18, 2004 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| May 18, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 11, 2004 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Apr 22, 2004 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 22, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 8, 2004 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Apr 8, 2004 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 20, 2004 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 20, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 8, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 8, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Apr 8, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 14, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 25, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 14, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 18, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 18, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 19, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 9, 2002 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 13, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 13, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 5, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |