USPTO serial 76195729
X
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BUONGIORNO, CHRISTOPHER L
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with X?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
92600 Asnieres, FR
92600 Asnieres, FR
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
GEORGE W. LEWIS
GEORGE W LEWIS NWJACOBSON HOLMAN PLLCTHE JENIFER BLDG 400 SEVENTH STWASHINGTON, DC 20004-2201Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | computer software for enterprise resource planning systems, namely, computer software to unify the financial, manufacturing and distribution systems of a business operation | ABANDONED | — |
| 042 | computer software design for others; consulting services in the field of design, selection, implementation and use of computer hardware and software systems for others; designing for others computer software for resources planning; maintenance of computer software; technical support services, namely, troubleshooting of computer hardware and software problems; designing for others software for enterprise resource planning systems; and maintaining and updating enterprise resource planning systems for mid-sized companies | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 27, 2004 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 24, 2004 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 24, 2004 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 24, 2004 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 12, 2004 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 12, 2004 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 16, 2003 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Sep 16, 2003 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 16, 2003 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 17, 2003 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 13, 2003 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 10, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 20, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 21, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 16, 2002 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 15, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 26, 2001 | 1.BD | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Dec 26, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 25, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 14, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 13, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 19, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 20, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |