USPTO serial 76195732
LAND PARK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WATSON, JULIE A
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with LAND PARK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
James E. Armstrong
NICOLAS E SECKEL WESTERMAN, HATTORI, DANIELS & ADRIAN LLPSTE 7001250 CONNECTICUT AVE NWWASHINGTON, DC 20036Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 038 | Providing multiple-user access to a global computer information network located at public accessible standalone computers; telecommunication services, namely, leasing access time to a computer database, transmission of data by means of a global computer network; providing information about telecommunication via Internet or mail; rental of message sending equipment; electronic mail services | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Providing information about computers, computer software and the computer industry via Internet or mail; computer software design for others; consultation services in the field of computer hardware and computer software; computer rental; rental of computer software and software packages; computer programming for others; videotaping; arena services, namely, providing facilities for exhibitions; consulting and technical assistance in the fields of designing, creating, hosting, maintaining operation of online commerce; providing customized online web pages featuring user-defined information, which includes search engines and online web links to other web sites; news agencies, namely, gathering and dissemination of news | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by CERUS INFORMATIQUE SAS
- Other trademarks owned by CERUS INFORMATIQUE SAS
- Other trademarks in Class 038
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named LAND PARK
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 25, 2006 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 25, 2006 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 9, 2006 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 17, 2006 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Feb 17, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 16, 2005 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 4, 2005 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Aug 4, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 18, 2005 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 18, 2005 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Feb 18, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 21, 2004 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 18, 2004 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Aug 18, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 16, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Mar 4, 2004 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 19, 2004 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Feb 19, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 26, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 19, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 27, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 7, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 10, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 4, 2003 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Apr 2, 2003 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jan 2, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 6, 2002 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 25, 2002 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 25, 2002 | 44ED | SEC. 44(E) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Oct 25, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 25, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 3, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 23, 2002 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Mar 21, 2002 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 9, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 21, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 6, 2001 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 20, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 5, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |