USPTO serial 76195904
POLYPACK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CARRUTHERS, SUE
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with POLYPACK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Alaine Doolan and all attorneys at Robinson & Cole LLP
ALAINE DOOLAN & ALL ATTORNEYS AT ROBIN ROBINSON & COLE LLP280 TRUMBULL STHARTFORD, CT 06103UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | Specialty chemicals and chemical blends used as polymer additives, namely, anti-static compounds, flame retardants, anti-blocking compounds, anti-slip compounds clarifiers, nucleating compounds, light stabilizers, ultra violet light absorbers, nickel quenchers, acid scavengers, cross-linking agents, aging inhibitors, antioxidants, anti-ozonantes, waxes, synthetic resins for manufacturing, all for use in the manufacture of fibers, films, extrusions, co-extrusions, molded articles, thermos-formed articles, and similar tangible articles or the raw material from which said articles are made | ACTIVE | — |
| 002 | Pigments and natural resins for manufacturing for use in the manufacture of fibers, films, extrusions, co-extrusions, molded articles, thermo-formed articles, and similar tangible articles or the raw material from which said articles are made | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Great Lakes Chemical Corporation
- Other trademarks owned by PABU Services, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 001
- Other trademarks in Class 002
- Similar marks named POLYPACK
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 24, 2006 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 24, 2006 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 4, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 18, 2006 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 23, 2006 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Feb 23, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 23, 2006 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 23, 2006 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 24, 2005 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 16, 2005 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Sep 16, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 15, 2005 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 15, 2005 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Mar 15, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 28, 2004 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 14, 2004 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Sep 14, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 17, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Mar 9, 2004 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 26, 2004 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Feb 26, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 15, 2003 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 16, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 24, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 13, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 4, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 29, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 24, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 24, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 30, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 29, 2002 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jan 24, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 4, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 10, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 4, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 2, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |