USPTO serial 76195959
HISTORIC NEW AMSTERDAM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DUBOIS, SUSAN L
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with HISTORIC NEW AMSTERDAM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Rita M Carrier
RITA M CARRIER SULLIVAN & CROMWELL1701 PENNSYLVANIA AVE NWWASHINGTON, DC 20006-5805UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 043 | Hotel services; Restaurant services | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 22, 2004 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jul 22, 2004 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 22, 2004 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 22, 2004 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 10, 2004 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| May 11, 2004 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 17, 2003 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 2, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 13, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 1, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 25, 2003 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jan 9, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 1, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 21, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 21, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 14, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 8, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |