Drawing for INFOGATE

USPTO serial 76196118

INFOGATE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
THOMPSON, HEATHER
Law office
DIVISIONAL UNIT

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with INFOGATE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

DOUGLAS R. BUSH

DOUGLAS R BUSH ARENT, FOX, KINTNER, PLOTKIN & KAHN1050 CONNECTICUT AVE NWWASHINGTON, DC 20036-5339UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009computer software used to access financial information, consumer information, business information, sports and entertainment information, news and weather via the Internet and other computer networksACTIVE—
035providing consumer business information via the Internet and other computer networksACTIVE—
036providing financial information via the Internet and other computer networksACTIVE—
041providing sports and entertainment information via the Internet and other computer networksACTIVE—
042Providing news and weather information via the Internet and other computer networksACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 9, 2005MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 9, 2005ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 28, 2004EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Jul 12, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Jun 28, 2004EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Jun 28, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 4, 2004EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jan 2, 2004EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jan 2, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 21, 2003EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jul 22, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 21, 2003EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jul 18, 2003FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Jan 21, 2003NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 29, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 18, 2002TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Oct 9, 2002NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Aug 7, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 6, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 18, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 17, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 17, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 17, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 11, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 25, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 27, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 26, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance