USPTO serial 76196140
INSTALLATION PROFESSIONALS OF NORTH AMERICA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CAIN, CATHERINE P
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with INSTALLATION PROFESSIONALS OF NORTH AMERICA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Hilton Head Island, SC
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
RICHARD M MOOSE
RICHARD M MOOSE DORITY & MANNINGP O BOX 1449GREENVILLE, SC 29602-1449UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 037 | Retail business renovation upfit and remodeling services, namely, constructing retail displays; fixture renovations, namely, fixture remodeling, assembly and placement of fixtures; sign and graphic placements; millwork retrofits, namely, carpentry services; custom construction and building renovation, namely, complete store buildouts; and merchandise assistance, namely, construction planning regarding fixtures usage and stocking distribution and fulfillment requirements | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 4, 2004 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Oct 4, 2004 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Sep 1, 2004 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jun 30, 2004 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Oct 30, 2003 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Oct 6, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 16, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Sep 8, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 7, 2003 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Mar 11, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 28, 2003 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jan 9, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 7, 2002 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Sep 26, 2002 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Apr 12, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 13, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 28, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 16, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 10, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 30, 2001 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| May 31, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 17, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |