USPTO serial 76196190
TITAN TECHNOLOGIES INTERNATIONAL, INC.
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- PAPPAS, MATTHEW
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with TITAN TECHNOLOGIES INTERNATIONAL, INC.?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Barry L Kelmachter
BARRY L KELMACHTER BACHMAN & LAPOINTE PC900 CHAPEL ST STE 1201NEW HAVEN, CT 06510-2802UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Power tools, namely, power wrenches | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | Wholesale distributorships featuring power tools, namely, power wrenches; on-line retail store services featuring power tools, namely, power wrenches | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Technical consultation in the field of power tools, namely power wrenches | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 16, 2004 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jan 13, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jan 4, 2004 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jan 4, 2004 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Sep 8, 2003 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| May 8, 2003 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 10, 2003 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jan 2, 2003 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Oct 31, 2002 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Oct 31, 2002 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Oct 24, 2002 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Oct 11, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 11, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 8, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 8, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 10, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 17, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |