USPTO serial 76196223
ENRICHING TIME THROUGH TECHNOLOGY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SNYDER, NELSON B
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ENRICHING TIME THROUGH TECHNOLOGY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
W1C 1BB London, GB
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Andrew N. Spivak
ANDREW N SPIVAK MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP2000 PENNSYLVANIA AVE N WWASHINGTON, DC 20006-1888UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Business services, namely, business consultancy and advisory services provided online via the Internet; providing business information in the field of consumer-profiled retail shopping via the Internet; online services to facilitate the conduct of business between purchaser and seller, namely, customizing consumer profiles of the easy selection of purchasing of online retail products; compilation of advertisements for use as web pages on the Internet; electronic commerce services, namely, dissemination of advertising for others via electronic communications networks; electronic retail store services and online ordering services via customer profiling, featuring general merchandise; and promoting the goods and services of others by providing a link to web sites of electronic merchants | ACTIVE | Dec 12, 2000 |
| 042 | Consultancy and advisory services in the field of telecommunications; technical support services, namely, troubleshooting of computer hardware and software problems via telephone and electronic mail | ACTIVE | Dec 12, 2000 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 5, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 17, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 15, 2002 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Nov 27, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 20, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 20, 2001 | 1.BA | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM ADDED | — |
| May 22, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 8, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |