USPTO serial 76196260
BIZARRE PROMOTIONS INC
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 614
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KING, LINDA M
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with BIZARRE PROMOTIONS INC?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Brownstown Township, MI
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Creighton D. Gallup
CREIGHTON D GALLUP PENTIUK COUVREUR & KOBILJAK PC2915 BIDDLE AVE STE 200EDELSON BLDGWYANDOTTE, MI 48190Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 021 | Official distribution of promotional products and inhouse embroidering and silk screening | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 13, 2004 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| Apr 13, 2004 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Mar 22, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 23, 2004 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Oct 3, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 23, 2003 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Mar 17, 2003 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 17, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 24, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 17, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 26, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 25, 2002 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| May 10, 2002 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| May 10, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 19, 2002 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Feb 14, 2002 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 10, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 17, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 9, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |