USPTO serial 76196300
FIELD.TRACKER.SYSTEM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Feb 17, 2004
- Examiner
- OH, WON TEAK
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with FIELD.TRACKER.SYSTEM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Calgary, Alberta T2X 1S3, CA
Calgary, Alberta T2X 1S3, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
John J O'Malley
JOHN J OMALLEY VOLPE AND KOENIG PCUNITED PLZ STE 160030 S 17TH STPHILADELPHIA, PA 19103Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 044 | Agricultural consulting services, namely, providing a website featuring crop and weed information and growing predictions, providing a database featuring crop and weed information and growing predictions, and providing crop and weed information and growing predictions | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 24, 2010 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jun 21, 2004 | COC. | CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Mar 25, 2004 | AMD7 | SEC 7 REQUEST FILED | — |
| Feb 17, 2004 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Dec 16, 2003 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 1, 2003 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Oct 21, 2003 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 18, 2003 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 19, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Dec 20, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 20, 2002 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 9, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 24, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 24, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 24, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 22, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 3, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 22, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 5, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 1, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 1, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 18, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |