USPTO serial 76196495
GUARDIAN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SHARPER JR, SAM
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with GUARDIAN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
SHERRY H. FLAX
SHERRY H FLAX SAUL EWING LLP100 S CHARLES STBALTIMORE, MD 21201UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 027 | reinforced vinyl polymer comprising a component of vinyl floor covering | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 24, 2004 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| May 11, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| May 11, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| May 11, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| May 6, 2004 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| May 6, 2004 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jan 28, 2004 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Sep 15, 2003 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Jul 24, 2003 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Apr 29, 2003 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Jan 21, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 15, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 15, 2003 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jan 15, 2003 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jan 10, 2003 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jan 3, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 1, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 24, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 24, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 13, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 1, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 16, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |