USPTO serial 76196595
SQUEAKY CLEAN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Apr 1, 2003
- Examiner
- AYALA, LOURDES
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with SQUEAKY CLEAN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
DUESSELDORF, DE
Costa Mesa, CA
Costa Mesa, CA
Costa Mesa, CA
HENKEL KOMMANDITGESELLSCHAFT AUF AKTIEN
DUESSELDORF, GA
Other trademarks owned by HENKEL KOMMANDITGESELLSCHAFT AUF AKTIEN
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Susan F. Evans
Susan F. Evans % Henkel of America, Inc.19001 N. Scottsdale RoadLegal Dept., M.S. 04.50Scottsdale, AZ 85255Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Soap, namely, hand, face and body cleansing cream, non-medicated cleansing wash, pre-moistened skin cleansing pads, body and face scrubs, bar soaps, liquid soaps, soap gels and lotions; cosmetics; perfumery, namely, perfume, cologne, toilet waters, aftershave; toiletries, namely, deodorants, antiperspirants, shaving cream, shaving lotion, shaving gel, cuticle creams and conditioners, facial masks, toothpaste, tooth gel, non-medicated mouthwash; non-medicated skin, hand, foot and body care preparations, namely, serums, masks, creams, oils, powders, sprays, mists, skin moisturizers and lotions, bath and shower gels and non-medicated bath salts, bubble bath, eye cream, sun screen, sun block, suntan lotions, and essentials oils for personal use; and non-medicated hair care preparations and hair styling preparations | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Oct 31, 2000 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by HENKEL AG & CO. KGAA
- Other trademarks owned by Amitee Cosmetics, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Amitee Cosmetics, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Amitee Cosmetics, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by HENKEL KOMMANDITGESELLSCHAFT AUF AKTIEN
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Similar marks named SQUEAKY CLEAN
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 7, 2009 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jan 14, 2009 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 25, 2008 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jun 1, 2008 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 1, 2008 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 10, 2008 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Dec 20, 2004 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 20, 2004 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| May 26, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 1, 2003 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jan 7, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 18, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 22, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 22, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 21, 2002 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Oct 21, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 28, 2002 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 26, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 26, 2002 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jun 11, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 22, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 15, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 6, 2001 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Nov 27, 2001 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Oct 29, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 21, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 31, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 21, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |