USPTO serial 76196673
KBHEADWORKS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MAHONEY, PAULA M
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with KBHEADWORKS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Toronto, Ontario, M4R IM1, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Sabrina C Stavish
SABRINA C STAVISH SHERIDAN ROSS PC1560 BROADWAY STE 1200DENVER, CO 80202-5145UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | PUBLICATIONS, NAMELY, NEWSLETTERS IN THE FIELD OF BUSINESS MANAGEMENT AND CONSULTATION | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | BUSINESS MANAGEMENT AND CONSULTATION SERVICES, NAMELY, PROVIDING ASSESSMENTS AND FACILITATION OF INNOVATION, LEADERSHIP, STRATEGIC PLANNING, STRATEGIC DEPLOYMENT AND COMMUNICATION FOR BUSINESSES | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 29, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 9, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 12, 2003 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 24, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 7, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 5, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 29, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 25, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |