USPTO serial 76196800
KISSMARK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MICHOS, LESLIE BISHOP
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with KISSMARK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Heather A. Dunn
HEATHER A DUNN DLA PIPER LLP US555 MISSION STREETSUITE 2400SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94105-2933Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | Clothing, footwear and headwear, namely, pants, shirts, T-shirts, sweatshirts, shorts, after ski boots, leotards, leggings, biking shorts, bike jerseys, wet suits for water skiing, ski suits, ski wear, jogging suits, warm up suits, athletic shoes, boots, sandals, badminton shoes, ballet slippers, thermal underwear, underwear, sweaters, golf shoes, swim suits, bathing suits, swimming trunks, beachwear, anoraks, ski jackets, cross country ski boots, basketball uniforms, basketball shoes, cycling shoes, football and soccer shoes, ice skating practice and competition clothing, namely, underwear, leotards, dresses, skirts, sweatshirts, sweat pants, shirts, pants, unitards, fleece jackets and fleece vests; moon boots; snowboard shoes; mountain bike clothing, namely, shorts, jerseys, shirts, sports shoes; telemark ski boots; tennis shoes; gym shoes; ballet clothes, namely, leotards, leggings, tights, leg warmers, shirts and tutus | ABANDONED | — |
| 028 | Golf gloves, biking gloves, hockey gloves, golf clubs, golf bags, golf tee markers, golf tees, golf balls, skis, badminton rackets, balls of all kinds, baseball bats, basketballs, cross country ski bindings, cross country ski poles, cross country skis, football and soccer balls, football and soccer equipment, namely, body protectors, chin guards; ice hockey equipment, namely, sticks, and goalie pads; ice skates; monoski; roller skates, safety ski bindings, ski accessories, namely, ski bags, alpine skis, bindings, ski cases, ski poles; ski binding accessories, namely, snow shoes, snowboard bindings, snowboard gloves; telemark skis; tennis equipment, namely, tennis rackets, tennis balls; touring skis, touring ski bindings; volleyballs, water skis, American footballs; inline skates | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 1, 2015 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| May 1, 2015 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| May 1, 2015 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 1, 2015 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 21, 2015 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 23, 2014 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 23, 2014 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 23, 2014 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 3, 2014 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 20, 2014 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 18, 2014 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 18, 2014 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 18, 2014 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 18, 2014 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 18, 2014 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 18, 2014 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 11, 2014 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 10, 2014 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 10, 2014 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 10, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 10, 2014 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jun 10, 2014 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| May 28, 2014 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 28, 2014 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 14, 2014 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 14, 2014 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 9, 2013 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 9, 2013 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 9, 2013 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 1, 2013 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jun 24, 2013 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 22, 2012 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 22, 2012 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 22, 2012 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 16, 2009 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 16, 2009 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| May 7, 2008 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| May 7, 2008 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 30, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 26, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 25, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 25, 2007 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jul 25, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 6, 2007 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Jun 12, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 25, 2007 | ADBS | 1(B) BASIS DELETED; NEW BASIS REQUESTED | — |
| Mar 20, 2007 | ATRQ | ATTORNEY REVIEW/DECISION ON AMENDMENT REQUIRED | — |
| Mar 15, 2007 | PCBG | PETITION TO DIRECTOR - CHANGE BASIS - GRANTED | — |
| Nov 30, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 21, 2006 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Nov 21, 2006 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 15, 2006 | PILM | PETITION INQUIRY LETTER ISSUED | — |
| Nov 9, 2006 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Aug 5, 2006 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| Jul 18, 2006 | PDCB | PETITION TO DIRECTOR - CHANGE BASIS - RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 18, 2006 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 24, 2006 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 24, 2006 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jan 24, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 26, 2005 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 26, 2005 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jul 26, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 8, 2004 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 18, 2004 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Nov 18, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 18, 2004 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 18, 2004 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 14, 2004 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 3, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jul 28, 2004 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jul 28, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 17, 2004 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 29, 2004 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jan 29, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 25, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 5, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 20, 2002 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 26, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 6, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 26, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 26, 2002 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Sep 25, 2002 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Sep 10, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 6, 2002 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 14, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 7, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 30, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 13, 2001 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| May 7, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 23, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 17, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |