USPTO serial 76196871
POWER PACKS CABLE TV HIGH-SPEED INTERNET TELEPHONE SERVICE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- NEVILLE, BRIAN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with POWER PACKS CABLE TV HIGH-SPEED INTERNET TELEPHONE SERVICE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mary Lu Sanders-Zinser
MARY LU SANDERS-ZINSER GALLOP, JOHNSON & NEUMAN, L C101 S HANLEY, STE 1600ST LOUIS, MO 63105UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 038 | Providing cable television, digital cable and digital music transmission services by fiber optic and/or coaxial cables; pay per view television transmission services; time shifted television; interactive television; interactive video; video on demand transmission services; telecommunications services, namely, the electronic transmission of data, music, images, sound, text and video by fiber optic and/or coaxial cables; wireless telecommunications services; electronic mail services; teleconferencing services; providing communications connections to global computer networks and local and wide area network systems by fiber optic and/or coaxial cable | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 30, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 8, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jul 18, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 19, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 8, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 11, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 5, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 26, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |