Drawing for SUN CHEMICAL SOLUTIONS

USPTO serial 76197179

SUN CHEMICAL SOLUTIONS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
STOKOLS, GWEN P
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SUN CHEMICAL SOLUTIONS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Rex A Donnelly

REX A DONNELLY RATNERPRESTIA PCP O BOX 1596WILMINGTON, DE 19899UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
041Recommending and providing customer training for the graphic arts industry, namely seminars and classes on color theory, color management, and how to use printing inks and chemicalsACTIVE—
042Providing value-added consulting services in the graphic arts industry, namely analyzing specific customer needs and recommending and providing comprehensive packages of goods and services to meet those needs, namely recommending and providing specific printing inks, printing chemicals, and other pressroom consumables; recommending and providing process quality and efficiency management tools and analysis; recommending and providing color management equipment; providing analytical services related to the graphic arts industry, namely consultation in the field of graphic artsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 25, 2005MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 25, 2005ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 4, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Dec 4, 2003EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Nov 21, 2003EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Nov 21, 2003EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 6, 2003EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
May 21, 2003EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
May 20, 2003EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 26, 2002NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Sep 3, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 14, 2002NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jul 2, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 1, 2002CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Jun 27, 2002ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Jun 27, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 26, 2002ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
May 29, 2002TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Mar 22, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 3, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 15, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 25, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 22, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance