USPTO serial 76197525
WEBSTER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MADDEN, ANNE
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 103 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with WEBSTER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Daniel I. Schloss
DANIEL I SCHLOSS GREENBERGMETLIFE BLDG200 PARK AVE FL 14NEW YORK, NY 10166-1400Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | computer input devices, namely electronic touchscreens, and computer whiteboards, all for use by business and institutions | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 23, 2004 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Nov 18, 2004 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Sep 10, 2004 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Sep 9, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 9, 2004 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Aug 31, 2004 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Aug 31, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 8, 2003 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Jul 30, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jul 16, 2003 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jul 16, 2003 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jul 16, 2003 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jun 24, 2003 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jun 18, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 25, 2003 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 4, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 21, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 21, 2003 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 26, 2002 | CNRU | DISAPPROVAL - AMENDMENT TO USE MAILED | — |
| Jul 31, 2002 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 29, 2002 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jul 29, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 28, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 8, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 8, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 27, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |