USPTO serial 76197591
CALL · CLICK · CONNECT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ELTON, DAVID JONATHAN
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CALL · CLICK · CONNECT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Toronto, Ontario M8Z 5E3, CA
Toronto, Ontario M8Z 5E3, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
LAWRENCE E LAUBSCHER JR
LAWRENCE E LAUBSCHER JR LAUBSCHER & LAUBSCHER1160 SPA RD STE 2BANNAPOLIS, MD 21403-1099UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 038 | Telecommunications services, namely, interactive voice response services | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 19, 2007 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 19, 2007 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 11, 2007 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 7, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 3, 2006 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 11, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 21, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 24, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 24, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 8, 2006 | ATRV | ATTORNEY REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 28, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 6, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Apr 6, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 6, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 6, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 5, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 5, 2006 | FAXX | FAX SENT | — |
| Apr 5, 2006 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 14, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 16, 2006 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 6, 2006 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 6, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 2, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 4, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 3, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 1, 2005 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Dec 30, 2004 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Aug 26, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 26, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 20, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 20, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 22, 2004 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Apr 24, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 24, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 9, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 8, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 26, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 29, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 10, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |