USPTO serial 76197973
DIALOG PLUS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MADDEN, ANNE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with DIALOG PLUS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
HIRSCHMANN ELECTRONICS GMBH & CO. KG
72654 Neckartenzlingen, DE
Other trademarks owned by HIRSCHMANN ELECTRONICS GMBH & CO. KG
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Herbert Dubno
HERBERT DUBNO THE FIRM OF KARL F ROSS PC5676 RIVERDALE AVE # 900BRONX, NY 10471-2138UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Hands-off devices for use with portable telephones in motor vehicle, namely, cell phone and handset holders, earpieces, microphones and cables, and mounting and operational instruction manuals sold as a unit therewith and cables and mounts for mobile and portable telephones | ACTIVE | — |
| 037 | Installation, maintenance and repair of hands-free devices for use with portable telephones in motor vehicle, namely, cell phone and handset holders, earpieces and microphones | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Technical consultation in the field of hands-free devices for use with portable telephones in motor vehicles | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 22, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 15, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 19, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 19, 2002 | PCDE | PETITION TO DIRECTOR DENIED | — |
| Feb 4, 2002 | PCRC | PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 28, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 5, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 15, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 2, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 30, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |