Drawing for BRAND-RX

USPTO serial 76197991

BRAND-RX

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
KIM, YONG OH
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BRAND-RX?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Susan U. Douglass

SUSAN U DOUGLASS FROSS ZELNICK LEHRMAN & ZISSU PC866 UNITED NATIONS PLZNEW YORK, NY 10017-1822UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035market research; business research services on intangible corporate assets, corporate image, corporate management, corporate governance, brand equity, human resources, customer services, product and service delivery and innovation, inventory and supply chain, and other aspects of businesses and dissemination of business reports in conjunction therewith; customized business research for others; providing an online computer database in the field of market research featuring ratings of intangible corporate assetsACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 7, 2003ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 5, 2003EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
Feb 19, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Feb 14, 2003EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
Aug 20, 2002NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
May 28, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 8, 2002NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Nov 2, 2001CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Jun 19, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
May 14, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 4, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance