USPTO serial 76198161
SUPERCLICK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ZAK, HENRY
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SUPERCLICK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
SALLY M ABEL
SALLY M ABEL FENWICK & WEST LLPSILICON VLY CTR801 CALIFORNIA STMOUNTAIN VIEW, CA 94041-2008Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | remote control devices used in connection with consumer electronic equipment, namely, remote control devices for television, interactive television, audio and video recorders and players, laser disc recorders and players, MP3 recorders and players, DVD recorders and players, stereos, radios, computers, video games and video game players, hand-held electronic devices, namely, portable audio, video, multimedia and digital devices, and home media servers, namely, computer and electronic servers used for storing, managing, sorting, browsing, editing and playing audio, video, multimedia and digital content | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by DIGEO, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by Digeo Broadband, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Digeo Broadband, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named SUPERCLICK
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 21, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 21, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 14, 2005 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 14, 2005 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Mar 14, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 9, 2004 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 15, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 12, 2004 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| May 13, 2004 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 28, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 26, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 15, 2004 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Apr 15, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 17, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 20, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 15, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jun 19, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 4, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 18, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 15, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Oct 15, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 30, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 23, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 3, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 12, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 8, 2002 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 29, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 21, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 28, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 25, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |